1. About.com
  2. News & Issues
  3. Environmental Issues

Obama Calls for a National High-Speed Rail Network

From Larry West, About.com Guide   April 16, 2009

Follow me on:


Image credit: The White House

President Obama today [April 16, 2009] unveiled his plan to develop a national network of high-speed passenger rail lines in 10 key transportation corridors across the United States—from California and the Pacific Northwest to the Gulf Coast and New England.

Obama said a new high-speed rail network would relieve congestion and provide both economic and environmental benefits.

“What we need . . . is a smart transportation system equal to the needs of the 21st century,” Obama said in an event at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, “a system that reduces travel times and increases mobility, a system that reduces congestion and boosts productivity, a system that reduces destructive emissions and creates jobs.”

President Obama proposed an initial investment of $13 billion to get the high-speed trains rolling. The first $8 billion would come from the president’s $787 billion economic stimulus package, money already set aside for improvements in rail service over the next two years. Obama also suggested another $5 billion investment ($1 billion annually over the next five years) as part of his administration’s recommended budget for fiscal year 2010. And all that is on top of $1.3 billion in federal funding for Amtrak.

The 10 regional transportation corridors chosen for the new high-speed rail network are all between 100 and 600 miles long. Each was selected because it shows great promise for potential benefits from high-speed rail development.

Only one high-speed rail line is currently operating in the United States—in the Northeast corridor between Washington, D.C., and Boston—but the president pointed out during his remarks that Europe and Japan have been using high-speed rail successfully for many years, and China is quickly becoming a world leader in high-speed rail transportation.

“Imagine whisking through towns at speeds over 100 miles an hour, walking only a few steps to public transportation, and ending up just blocks from your destination,” Obama said. “It is happening right now; it’s been happening for decades. The problem is, it’s been happening elsewhere, not here.”

The president's plan drew praise from many environmental and transportation experts, but with a few caveats about the need to take an integrated multi-modal approach to solving the nation's transportation problems.

“The President is on the right track,” said Nancy Kete, director of EMBARQ—The World Resources Institute Center for Sustainable Transport, a nonprofit organization that develops transportation solutions for cities worldwide. “The new plan to integrate high-speed rail with urban transit will help reduce congestion and make cities better places to live. But there’s a missing mode in the plan. To complement rail, we also need to help cities build high-quality, high-capacity bus rapid-transit systems, which can offer good high-speed service, but at a fraction of the cost of rail.”

Kete said the Obama administration also should consider new pricing policies, such as raising fuel taxes and charging car commuters for entering downtown streets during rush hour: "This will not only cut traffic and clear air pollution, but it will also raise much-needed revenue for better transportation services, including mass transit expansion and highway maintenance."

But today was all about Obama's vision for a national high-speed rail network.

“There's no reason why the future of travel should lie somewhere else beyond our borders," he said. "Building a new system of high-speed rail in America will be faster, cheaper and easier than building more freeways or adding to an already overburdened aviation system—and everybody stands to benefit.”

Also Read:

Comments

April 17, 2009 at 9:57 pm
(1) guidoLaMoto says:

Can you say “Boon-doggle”, children?
You will find that 8 billion dollars of federal money has already been wasted on high speed rail projects since 1965. Nobody wants to use it. The feds will run it. Cf: Amtrak & the USPS. The best excuse Durbin & Quinn could up with is that it will save Cub fans one whole hour when they’re wasting a whole day anyways going to St. Louis to see a ball game.

April 22, 2009 at 9:38 am
(2) Firozali A.Mulla says:

Obama Calls for a National High-Speed Rail Network
Some how I am not a mechanic. When I accelerate my car to speed the gas consumption goes up. The sped of 90 I am told is best for the petrol consumption. I have tried this truth. The fast train may heat up the surrounding faster and blow many things away. Is that the wind doing this? May be I am a nut, but these are facts.
Prosopagnosia
NOTES:
Prosopagnosia is also known as face blindness, usually a result of brain injury. People suffering from it cannot recognize familiar faces, even their own. A book on this and related topics is neurologist Oliver Sacks’s “The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat.
Prosopagnosiacs’ motto: We do not take people at face value.
USAGE:
“Rob Cross, 25, acquired prosopagnosia four years ago when a virus attacked his brain. For years, he has hidden his condition by avoiding calling his co-workers at a Burnaby manufacturing company by name or acting slightly aloof. ‘Every morning people say, “Hi Rob,” and the majority of the time I don’t know who it is,’ said Mr. Cross.”
Hayley Mick; We Know Each Other, But Who Are You? Globe and Mail (Toronto, Canada); Jan 10, 2008.
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

March 19, 2010 at 4:44 am
(3) Train says:

Good news!

It is clear to me that this isn’t a new plan for infrastructure, but rather a plan to build infrastructure that has been hypothesized for years.

The map is no different than the one that has been on the DOT website for years, except that it now has a slightly different graphic design.

I would expect to see the map modified somewhat in the coming years, as new planning refines the plans.

For instance, I would expect to see Cleveland to the east connections and Houston to other Texas T-bone cities connections. Boston to Montreal might turn into New York to Montreal.

The strategic plan is two provide funding for three activities:

-Ready to go projects that have benefits
-Entire corridors
-Planning

I expect to see projects funding for the NW, SE, upstate NY, and Midwest to be some of the first action we see out of this. CA is likely to fall under the entire corridor program. Hopefully a careful and aggressive planning effort to fix the Chicago bottlenecks and reach the potential of the MWRRI is also in the works.

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved. 

A part of The New York Times Company.